This issue of “Ethics and Algorithms” is about the impact of AI technologies on the arts and music. Here is a totally AI produced and peformed song video. Then, as a guitarist who played in clubs in cover bands as teen, I think AI cover songs like Freddie Mercury of Queen singing Celine Dion’s “Heart Will Go On” is entertaining creativity. These examples are what this issue focuses on.
As we look towards the future, there’s a sense of optimism about the evolution of art, even amidst technological advancements like AI. While I acknowledge the potential of AI in augmenting artistic expression, I strongly believe the essence of art lies in human creativity and personal experience. This view aligns with the consistent theme of the enduring importance of human interaction in art. The future of art, thus, seems not just technologically enriched but also deeply rooted in the human touch and experience, ensuring that art continues to evolve while retaining its intrinsic value.
First Things
Text to audio generators driven by natural language processing user interfaces such as Meta’s MusicGen, while still hit and miss based on the skill level of prompt writers, are well on the way to redefining music creation. I remember the early days of the world wide web and browsers like Mosaic/Netscape when creating graphics and animations was early days. Generating audio music is clearly entering a new era. It will not be long before sophistication in AI music generation, mastering, and production transforms music creation.
At the time of this writing in January 2024, many view the use of AI in creative work as lazy and uncreative. When I was a child in grade school, learning a musical instrument was viewed as positive for mental health and learning art and math. Then came synthesisers at Moog in my city of origin, and people began to produce the sounds of strings, horns, and percussion from a keyboard. Was this music? Was there a loss of soul, richness, or quality? Today, the cutting edge of copyright includes the ruling by the US Copyright Office in March 2023 that copyright protection depends on the amount of human creativity involved, and that the most popular AI systems likely do not create copyrightable work.
Convincing vocal imitations of voice actors and singers leveraging advances of AI language modelling type a description of music into a chatbot prompt and original music is produced. This is a profound capability because it completely transforms the accessibility and utility of creative music (Brown). Text-to-audio creates a fluid interface in a no code no programmer needed stream of end user music creation. There is prerequisite human talent needed to make music. When Adobe Photoshop used digital technology to create images, the argument from artists was it was not true graphic art. Now it is graphic art because it was another tool artists could use to express with. It will be the same with music. It is my view this technology will dominate music creation even though it is very early stage.
AI has the potential to impact various jobs and roles in the arts and music, but it’s more likely to transform these roles rather than completely replace them. Here are areas that might see significant change. AI can assist in composing music, generating ideas, and even producing tracks, which could affect composers, arrangers, and music producers. AI tools can create visual art and designs, impacting graphic designers and visual artists, particularly in areas like stock imagery and basic design tasks.
In music, AI could potentially be used in live performances, either as virtual musicians or as tools enhancing human performances. AI can aid in curating art collections and restoring artworks, impacting roles in museums and galleries. AI’s capability in audio editing and mixing could change the roles of sound engineers and technicians. AI’s growing capabilities in editing could impact roles in film and video production, particularly for routine editing tasks. In fields like journalism, marketing, and scriptwriting, AI can generate written content, potentially changing the roles of writers and content creators. Advocates of AI (like me) will argue AI is likely to augment these roles rather than fully replace human creativity and expertise. The integration of AI will indeed free up human artists and workers to focus on more creative, strategic, and complex aspects of their work. It will also replace many people and elininate a substantial number of jobs. I encourage you to read “AI and My Job?”
A New Spiral of Human Ingenuity and Progress
As we continue our journey through the spiraling pathway of human progress in the AI revolution of human enhancement, particularly in the realms of arts and music, the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands as a pivotal moment.
This cutting-edge technology is not merely a tool but a collaborator, reshaping our creative processes and expanding the horizons of artistic possibility. AI in music composition, for instance, is a testament to this new jam, where algorithms can not only analyse and understand existing musical patterns but also generate new compositions, blending the old with new innovation. This fusion of AI with traditional music-making echoes the very essence of the human artistic spirit—a relentless pursuit of expression and exploration, now augmented by the boundless potential of AI. As AI continues to evolve, it promises to enhance our artistic heritage, marking a new era in the ever-expanding spiral of human creativity in arts and music.
The Value of Personal Interaction with Art
In today’s digital landscape, the significance of personal engagement with art is changing—again. Art exhibitions and performances are more than cultural happenings; they are a call to immerse oneself in an enriching sensory and emotive journey. This involvement transcends passive observation, fostering an active, mindful dialogue between the viewer and the artwork. This is why I appreciate and encourage engaging the arts live in-person.
When we encounter a painting or experience a live performance, our role extends beyond mere spectators. We become active participants in a conversation, where each artwork or performance, be it a classic masterpiece, act, or performance narrates a story or conveys an emotion between ourselves, othes in the audience, and the artists or performers. This interaction is deeply personal, as each viewer brings their unique perspectives and feelings to the interpretation.
Art also acts as a unifier among individuals and the community. In galleries or theatres, diverse groups share in a collective yet individualistic experience. This aspect of art appreciation promotes unity and comprehension, bridging societal divides.
The design of art spaces is crucial in this interactivity. Curators and artists intentionally craft these environments to encourage reflection and emotional response. Every aspect, from the layout and lighting to the artwork sequence, is designed to guide audiences on an engaging journey.
In the realm of ethics and algorithms, the personal connection with art serves as a reminder of the irreplaceable essence of human emotion and experience as humans are using machine technology like they do a paint brush or musical instrument. As we find our way through a technology-driven world, the arts provide a haven for personal introspection and community bonding, maintaining our human touch in a digitised society.
This fusion of individual engagement and community interaction highlights the continuing relevance of art in our lives, underscoring its importance for cultural and emotional well-being.
AI Ethics and the Arts
The geneal framework I use to assess the impact of AI on a specific field or industry is as follows:
- Explainability – can we understand how an AI model arrives at its outputs?
- Fairness – will the model reflect unwanted biases or be equitable?
- Robustness – will the model be secure, reliable and safe from vulnerabilities?
- Privacy – will personal data be properly protected and secured?
- Transparency – are the data sources, programming, and purposes openly communicated?
In each analysis of an industry or field I complete, I will also add ethical challenges unique to the topic. In the arts and music, here are key ethical questions to consider:
Explainability Ethics in the Arts and Music
Prior to the AI revolution, explainability in the arts and music often revolved around the interpretation of creative works. Explainability was only an ethical issue when it was a sub-issue of another ethics challenge such as copyright infringement. The challenge of explainability was more an academic understanding of the intent and process behind an artist’s work, which was sometimes deliberately obscure or left to audience interpretation. Artists might explain their work through interviews, writings, or artist statements, providing insights into their creative process. However, in many cases, the interpretation was left to critics, scholars, and audiences, leading to multiple perspectives on the same piece of art or music. This approach allowed for a diverse range of interpretations and understandings, reflecting the subjective nature of art.
New Explainability Ethics Challenges
The emergence of deepfake technology in AI created music, which can replicate an artist’s voice or style, presents significant ethical challenges. This technology raises concerns about consent, as artists’ voices can be used without their permission, potentially for misleading or harmful purposes. Additionally, it blurs the lines between authenticity and fabrication, making it difficult for audiences to discern what is genuine. Deepfake technology raises ethical issues in painting and other creative arts as well. The ability to replicate the style and technique of artists can lead to creations that are indistinguishable from originals, raising questions about authenticity and originality. This technology could be used to create forgeries or falsely attribute works to renowned artists. These challenges highlight the need for mechanisms to verify the authenticity of artworks and protect the rights and legacy of artists. Addressing these issues requires clear legal and ethical guidelines to govern the use and distribution of such technology, emphasising the need for consent and transparency.
How Can AI Strengthen Explainability in the Arts and Music?
The complexity of AI algorithms can obscure how artistic decisions are made, leading to uncertainty about the origins of AI-created art.
AI can address deepfake challenges in the arts by developing AI algorithms that can detect deepfakes by analysing patterns and inconsistencies not easily noticeable by humans. AI can implement digital watermarking techniques in AI-generated artworks to ensure authenticity and origin. AI can maintain blockchain-based logs or records of the AI’s creation process, including data sources and decision pathways, which can help in clarifying the origins of AI-generated works.
As in all consitutional AI, ethics feedback by implementing mechanisms that allow for tracking and understanding how feedback affects AI’s learning and decision-making process in reinforcement learning scenarios is also an important methodology. Maintaining detailed records of the AI development process, including algorithmic choices is important in order to assure that these strategies aim to make AI’s learning and decision-making processes more transparent, thereby enhancing explainability. To learn more about supervised and reinforcement learning in AI ethics, read my earlier newsletter, “AI Changed the World. Who Will Change AI?”
To build ethics into AI learning models like supervised and reinforcement learning, especially to address deepfake challenges, involves several strategies. 1.) Ensuring that the training data used is ethically sourced and free from material that could contribute to unethical outcomes like deepfakes. 2.) Making the AI’s decision-making processes as transparent as possible, allowing for easier understanding and explainability of how it generates outputs. 3.) Integrating ethical guidelines directly into the AI’s learning process, ensuring it adheres to principles that prevent the creation of deceptive or harmful content. 4.) Using reinforcement learning to adjust the AI’s output based on ethical feedback, continuously refining its performance to align with ethical standards.
A quick Word About Enhancement to Explainability in Musical Education
AI can address explainability in its training and learning processes by creating transparent training sets. Clearly documenting and sharing the composition of training sets helps in understanding the kind of data AI is using to learn. This includes detailing the genres, styles, and sources of the music in the dataset. Then, engineers can code explainable supervised learning models that are more interpretable, where the decision-making process can be more easily understood. This could involve simpler models or techniques that allow for better insight into how input data influences the AI’s output. As in the analogue era, AI generated art and music will still involve human giftedness and creativity in prompts, use of technology, and skillsets which are unique and proprietary. Those who teach theory and technique will use AI to analyse the work of creators. I find this a fascinating dimension to visibility into the mind and neuroscience of creators and their creations.
Fairness Ethics in the Arts and Music
Systems trained only on certain genres or cultures may perpetuate biases against underrepresented groups. An AI trained predominantly on Western classical music might struggle to create or even properly interpret other genres like traditional indigenous, African, Asian, or Indian music. In the analogue or pre-AI world, the ethical issue of fairness in music often manifested in the form of cultural representation and diversity in mainstream media and educational curricula. Certain genres or cultures, especially Western classical music, received more emphasis and visibility, while others were often underrepresented or misunderstood. This imbalance affected not just the exposure and appreciation of diverse music styles but also influenced the opportunities available to artists from various cultural backgrounds. The challenge was to ensure equitable representation and appreciation across the broad spectrum of global music cultures.
Addressing bias and fairness before AI generated music involved efforts to diversify representation and programming. This included promoting works from a wider range of cultural backgrounds, creating platforms for underrepresented artists, and revising educational curricula to include diverse musical traditions. Festivals, exhibitions, and concerts began showcasing a broader spectrum of global art and music. Additionally, outreach programs and scholarships aimed to provide opportunities to artists from diverse cultures, encouraging a more inclusive approach to art and music appreciation. So how can AI enhance our human efforts to improve fainess in the arts?
How Can AI Strengthen Human Fairness in the Arts?
Supervised and reinforcement learning can be used to address fairness in AI-generated music by first, utilising supervised learning with diverse and representative datasets to help AI systems learn a wide range of musical styles and cultural expressions. This ensures that the AI does not favor one genre or cultural style over others. Second, reinforcement learning can be employed to refine the AI’s output based on feedback. This feedback can come from a diverse group of users and experts in different musical traditions, guiding the AI to produce more balanced and culturally diverse outputs. By combining these approaches, AI in music can be trained to be more inclusive and fair, representing a broad spectrum of musical heritage and styles.
Robustness Ethics in the Arts and Music
As training set data is amassed, there is high likelihood and severity risk that AI might perpetuate or even amplify existing societal biases, impacting the nature of artistic output. An AI trained on data with inherent biases, such as gender or racial stereotypes present in song lyrics, might produce new works that inadvertently perpetuate these biases. Neural networks could allow embedded toxicity or inherit unintended social biases that corrupt artistic output. An AI trained on data with inherent biases, like gender or racial stereotypes in song lyrics, might produce works that inadvertently perpetuate these biases.
AI learning models can enhance ethical robustness and address bias challenges by using a diverse and inclusive dataset to help prevent the system from learning and amplifying existing biases. Implementing algorithms specifically designed to identify and correct biases in both training data and AI outputs and incorporating regular reviews by human experts can help identify and rectify biases that AI might miss. Developing AI within established ethical frameworks ensures consideration of potential biases and their impacts.
How Can AI Strengthen Robustness in the Arts?
Again, supervised and reinforcement learning is critical here. By using a diverse and representative dataset, supervised learning can help the AI system recognise and appropriately respond to a wide range of scenarios, reducing the risk of biased or inadequate responses. Reinforcement learning can adapt the AI’s behavior based on feedback, which can be designed to discourage biased responses and encourage fair and balanced outcomes. This continual learning process allows the system to evolve and improve its ethical robustness over time. Allowing AI models to continuously learn from diverse and updated datasets can mitigate the risk of entrenched biases. By combining these approaches, AI systems can become more robust and ethically sound, especially in handling biases.
Privacy Ethics in the Arts and Music
In the pre-AI, analogue era, privacy issues in the arts and music primarily revolved around unauthorised recording and distribution of performances, piracy of copyrighted works, and the unconsented use of artists’ work. These issues were addressed through legal measures like copyright laws, which sought to protect the intellectual property rights of artists and creators. Additionally, physical security measures at live performances, such as restrictions on recording devices, were implemented to safeguard against unauthorised recordings.
The use of AI in creating and producing music can increase privacy risks in several ways. AI systems often require large datasets for training, including user data such as listening habits, preferences, and personal information, which could be collected without explicit consent. AI-driven personalisation in music services could lead to overreliance on personal data, potentially infringing on individual privacy. The storage and processing of large amounts of data by AI systems increase the risk of data breaches, potentially exposing sensitive user information.
There is a risk that AI systems in music production and distribution could be used for surveillance, especially if they are capable of voice recognition or other forms of audio analysis. Overall, the integration of AI in music creation and distribution necessitates robust privacy protection measures to safeguard user data. Collecting and processing personal data like playlists to train musical AIs risks privacy violations. A music recommendation AI that uses listeners’ personal playlists could inadvertently reveal private preferences or sensitive information.
How Can AI Strengthen Privacy in the Arts?
While AI prsents new risks, it also brings new capabilities to enhance privacy ethics in human/AI collaboration. Privacy is improved by implementing AI algorithms that automatically detect and anonymise sensitive data in artistic content using AI to improve data encryption and security measures, safeguarding personal and proprietary information used in the creative process. AI systems can manage and track user consents more efficiently, ensuring that personal data is used in accordance with user preferences and legal requirements. By integrating these AI-driven approaches, the collaboration between humans and AI can be made more secure and respectful of privacy concerns.
Transparency Ethics in the Arts and Music
Before AI-generated art and music, transparency in the arts and entertainment was primarily addressed through crediting practices, artist interviews, and behind-the-scenes insights. Artists and creators were credited for their work in exhibitions, albums, or performances. Interviews and documentaries offered audiences insights into the creative process. Additionally, critics and scholars played a role in analysing and discussing the influences and techniques behind artworks and music, providing a deeper understanding of the creative process. This approach helped maintain a level of transparency regarding the origins and creation of artistic works.
The AI revolution raises new transparency ethics risks. Determining the true “creator” of AI-generated works can be challenging, raising questions about the origin and ownership of the artwork. The contributions of original human artists that train or inspire AI systems may go undisclosed. A digital art piece created by AI might not disclose that it was inspired by or directly derived from a human artist’s earlier work. Understanding the full extent of the influences on AI, including the data it was trained on, can be difficult, potentially obscuring the sources of its “inspiration.” There is also process opacity issues whereby the algorithms and decision-making processes of AI can be complex and not easily understood, making it hard to explain how a piece of art or music was created. These risks necessitate careful consideration and new approaches to ensure transparency in AI-generated art and music.
How Can AI Strengthen Transparency in the Arts?
AI can enhance transparency in the arts and music by providing detailed metadata and documentation about the creation process, origin, and influences of AI-generated works. It can track and display the various inputs and modifications made during the creation process. Additionally, AI can analyse and reveal patterns and influences in artworks and music, offering insights that might not be immediately apparent to human observers. This can deepen the understanding and appreciation of the creative process, both for AI-generated and human-created works.
Accessibility Ethics in the Arts
Historically, accessibility to the arts has been significantly influenced by economic status. The patronage system, where wealthy individuals or organisations supported artists, often dictated which artists could pursue and develop their work. This system created a disparity, where only those with affluent patrons or commercial success could thrive, often sidelining talented artists from less privileged backgrounds. This economic barrier to entry in the arts reflected broader societal inequalities and limited the diversity of voices and perspectives in artistic expression.
Addressing this issue involves not only providing equitable access to resources and platforms but also rethinking the value and support systems for art in society. Accessibility refers to the cost and technical hurdles of AI art tools which could exclude populations from creative participation. Advanced AI art tools might be expensive or require technical expertise, making them inaccessible to artists with limited resources.
How Did Humans Deal with Accessibility Ethics Challenges Pre-AI?
In the pre-AI era, accessibility challenges in arts and music creation included the physical and financial barriers that limited access to resources, education, and platforms for artists and audiences. These were addressed by governments and organisations provided funding and grants to support artists from diverse backgrounds and to make arts education and resources more accessible. Local arts programs and workshops aimed to bring arts education and experiences to underrepresented communities.
Efforts were made to make venues and events more accessible to people with disabilities, though this remains an area needing improvement. With a disabled child, I appreciate the efforts made by organisations such as Your Music Inc. to provide special sensory friendly events and accomodations for the disabled. Nevertheless, govenment schools and programs remain biased against the neurodivergent disabled like my son. This is an area my wife and I are using AI to change by equipping parents with the awareness and education to have better access and accomodation.
These measures i the pre-AI period sought to democratise access to the arts, although challenges persisted, particularly in reaching remote or marginalised communities. AI can enhance accessibility in the arts in several ways.
1. AI can lower costs for artistic creation and distribution, making tools and platforms more accessible to a wider range of artists and audiences.
2. AI can tailor artistic experiences to individual needs, including accessibility options for people with disabilities.
3. AI-driven platforms can facilitate remote access to artistic content and creation, reaching people in geographically isolated or underserved areas.
By leveraging these capabilities, AI has the potential to significantly democratize access to the arts, making it more inclusive and diverse.
The Role of Museums in Cultural Engagement
Museums stand as pivotal institutions in the landscape of cultural engagement. They are custodians of history, art, and knowledge, offering a tangible link to our collective past and a window into various cultures and epochs. The question of accessibility to museums is not just logistical but philosophical. Should these repositories of human heritage be readily accessible to all, particularly children and the general public? This is a question we also ask about libraries.
The argument for more open access to museums is compelling. By removing financial barriers, museums become spaces where art and history are available to a broader audience. This inclusivity is especially crucial for children, for whom early exposure to the arts and history can ignite lifelong passions and educational pursuits. Engaging the young in museum experiences is an investment in the future, fostering a more culturally aware and educated society.
Museums also serve as communal spaces where diverse groups can gather, learn, and engage in dialogue. They are not just about preserving the past; they are about shaping the future through education and inspiration. The democratisation of access to these cultural treasures underlines the belief that knowledge and beauty should not be privileges but universal rights.
In an age where digital media dominates, the physical experience of being in a museum, surrounded by artifacts and artworks, is irreplaceable. It connects us to the broader narrative of human achievement and creativity. As we advocate for wider accessibility to museums, we reinforce the message that culture, history, and art are integral to the fabric of society, deserving of exploration by all, irrespective of socio-economic background.
My Advisory to Museums
AI can assist museums in becoming more globally accessible through virtual reality (VR) and other digital platforms. By creating virtual tours and interactive experiences, museums can reach a wider audience (total available market), including those who are unable to physically visit. To maintain funding, museums can implement a tiered access model, offering basic virtual access for free while charging a premium for more immersive or interactive experiences—worldwide! Additionally, exclusive online exhibitions or special digital events can be used as revenue generators, providing unique value to virtual visitors. This approach allows museums to expand their reach while preserving essential income streams. If you would like to have me work with you on innovative business models, please contact me (see Last Things for contact on Whats App).
AI Robot creating music and art
Orginality Ethics in the Arts and Music
Generative art AIs may produce works highly imitative of training data rather than pioneering novel styles. An AI might generate paintings heavily reminiscent of Van Gogh’s style, raising questions about the originality of these AI-created works.
Prior to AI-generated art and music, ethical challenges in originality centered around issues like plagiarism, cultural appropriation, and the fine line between inspiration and imitation. Artists and musicians faced the challenge of creating work that was distinct and innovative while being influenced by existing works and styles. The art world grappled with questions about when inspiration becomes copying, and how to respect cultural heritage without appropriating it. The legal system, along with social and professional norms, played a role in navigating these challenges, though they often remained complex and subjective.
Humans addressed the ethical challenges of originality in arts and music through various means. Copyright laws were established to protect original works and discourage plagiarism. The art and music communities developed norms and ethical guidelines to distinguish between inspiration and appropriation. Art and music education often focused on encouraging original thought and creativity. Critiques from peers and critics played a role in maintaining standards of originality and calling out instances of copying or appropriation.
AI in arts and music introduces new ethical risks to originality not previously encountered in human-generated content. AI can generate art and music at a scale and speed unattainable by humans, potentially flooding the market with derivative works. It becomes challenging to distinguish between AI-generated content and human creativity, leading to questions about the true source of originality. AI’s ability to closely mimic existing styles and artists could undermine the value of original, human-created works. Overreliance on AI in the creative process might lead to a decline in human-driven originality in the arts.
How Can AI Strengthen Originality in the Arts?
AI can assist humans in overcoming traditional unethical originality challenges in the arts and music by providing artists with new tools and techniques, enabling them to explore creative possibilities beyond traditional methods. AI can analyse a vast array of cultural works, offering artists insights and inspirations from a wider range of sources, thereby broadening their creative horizons. AI algorithms can be used to detect similarities between a new work and existing works, helping to prevent unintentional plagiarism. AI can be programmed with ethical frameworks that encourage respect for originality and discourage the replication of existing works without proper transformation or homage.
AI can also strengthen originality ethics in the arts and music by serving as a tool to inspire human artists, suggesting novel combinations or ideas that might not occur in typical human creative processes. AI can analyse and draw from a broader range of styles and cultures, offering artists new and diverse sources of inspiration. AI can facilitate the creation of entirely new forms of art and music, pushing the boundaries of traditional genres. AI can tailor artistic experiences to individual preferences, creating unique, personalised works that reflect the tastes and influences of individual users.
Attribution Ethics in the Arts and Music
Before AI, as already mentioned, unethical attribution practices in the arts and music included plagiarism, where artists would copy work from others without acknowledgment, and insufficient credit given to collaborators or lesser-known artists, especially in instances where their contributions were significant. There were also instances of cultural appropriation, where elements of one culture were used by artists from another culture without proper understanding, respect, or credit. These issues were often addressed through legal actions, public outcry, or industry self-regulation.
In the new world of AI creativty, proper acknowledgement for both AI developers and the human artists who trained them is often lacking. When an AI generates a new piece of music, the software developers, AI trainers, and original composers whose work influenced the AI’s training might not receive proper acknowledgment or compensation.
How Can AI Strengthen Attribution in the Arts?
AI can help correct ethical dilemmas in attribution by providing accurate and fair recognition for all contributors. It can analyse contributions to identify and credit all involved parties. Blockchain technology can play a crucial role in this by offering a transparent and immutable record of the creation process and contributions, ensuring that everyone receives proper credit and compensation.
Authorship and Copyright in the Digital Age
In the digital era, the conversation around authorship and copyright is increasingly complex, echoing back to the days of Napster. The emergence of AI and digital reproduction technologies presents new challenges. We must consider the evolving nature of image trading and the pressing need for copyright laws to adapt, especially concerning images used in AI training sets—a challenge taking place right now as noted in The Stanford Internet Observatory recently came out with its “Identifying and Eliminating CSAM [child sexual abuse material] in Generative ML Training Data and Models” report
Another critical aspect is the use of human-made art in AI-generated pieces. This intertwines with the broader perspective on the changing nature of artistic ownership. As AI becomes more prevalent in the creative process, distinguishing between human and machine-generated content becomes crucial, raising questions about originality and rights. The balance between embracing technological advances and protecting artists’ rights is delicate, necessitating an ethical and legal framework that evolves in tandem with technological advancements.
I Talk to AIs: The Impact of AI on the Arts, Music, and Creativity
Kevin L. Baker: We’re witnessing AI’s growing influence in the arts, fine arts, and music. GPT-4, how do you perceive AI’s role in these creative domains?
GPT-4: AI, in these fields, acts as a facilitator, offering new avenues for creative expression. However, it’s essential to remember that AI is a tool, enhancing rather than replacing human creativity.
Kevin L. Baker: The integration of AI into music and the arts raises many questions. Take MusicGen by Meta, for instance. How do you see AI models like this transforming the creative process?
GPT-4: Tools like MusicGen represent significant shifts. AI can interface with digital audio workstations, automate mastering, and even replicate convincing vocal imitations. However, this technological evolution comes with critical concerns.
Kevin L. Baker: Indeed, there are worries about the loss of jobs, copyright issues, and the quality of AI-generated art. How do you respond to criticisms that AI in creativity is laziness or lacks soul?
GPT-4: While AI can streamline certain processes, it doesn’t replace the essential human touch in art. Critics argue that AI-generated music might lack emotional richness, potentially flooding the market with low-quality content. There’s also the risk of monopolies in creative production, similar to what we’ve seen in other industries.
Kevin L. Baker: And what about the potential biases in AI? Could AI in the arts reinforce social biases and stereotypes found in music and art?
GPT-4: That’s a valid concern. AI systems can perpetuate existing biases, and there’s a risk that telling a machine to create art might diminish the creativity and imagination inherent in the process.
Kevin L. Baker: Do you think AI could lead to the equivalent of social media doom scrolling in the arts?
GPT-4: There’s a possibility. Over-reliance on AI could result in a deluge of content, making it harder to find truly creative and original works. The context of creation and performance in the arts might also be impacted, raising questions about the authenticity and value of AI-generated art.
Kevin L. Baker: It seems we’re navigating complex waters with AI in the arts, balancing technological possibilities with preserving the human essence of creativity.
GPT-4: Exactly. It’s about finding that equilibrium where AI supports and enhances human creativity, without overshadowing it.
The Future of Art and Cultural Expression
As I wrote the prompts in my conversation with GPT-4, I found the AI struggling to answer—which is highly unusual. Humans are the engineers behind the machine learning. It seems when we come to the arts versus STEM topics, we are witnessing a gap in the most human aspects of life and beauty. I encourage the tech companies to turn to an interdisciplinary approach with artists and philosophers at this intesection of AI and human creativity.
Last Things: Personal Experiences and Artistic Process
Artists in the digital age navigate a unique blend of physical and digital elements in their creations. Quoting insights from various artists, we see that their processes often involve a deep interaction with both traditional mediums and digital platforms. They engage with public spaces like the Guggenheim, utilising these venues to showcase how physical and digital art forms can coexist and complement each other.
Digital formats often leave viewers yearning for a more tangible experience, pointing to a gap that physical art can fill. This concept ties back to the intersection of digital and physical realms in art, highlighting the unique emotional responses elicited by different mediums.
As AI continues to evolve, it will play a significant role in the transmission of our current culture into the future. Artistic expressions serve as a vital part of our cultural identity and legacy, connecting us across time and space. This reinforces the idea that art, in all its forms, is a fundamental aspect of what it means to be human, capturing our collective experiences and emotions.
Last Things
Copyright 2023 by Kevin Baker Consulting
Kevin is now accepting consulting rquests with companies and organisations to build a consitutional ethical approach to the use of AI in business, or management consulting with Boards or executives. You can contact him on WhatsAPP or by email at kbaker@kevinbakerinc.com
Join Kevin’s Inner Circle and the “Baker on Business” letter. The Inner Circle is Kevin’s email broadcast list for his Baker on Business letter. Each issue contains an article not published anywhere else dealing with executive level topics and discussions directly related to growth and current economic trends and data. This is the only source for exclusive specials on digital courses, news about upcoming engaging podcasts, advance special book pricing, riveting live sessions, Mastermind groups, and recorded videos. It’s all here. It’s all free. Your dedication fuels our passion to share. 🚀
Go here to get past full issues or subscribe to this newsletter.
This experimental) newsletter is (purposely) stuffed with formatting, spelling and other strategic mistakes.
Most of the ideas, research, frameworks (and even big chunks of the writing) are as a direct result of (or completely lifted from) my partnership with Katie Baker, aka wife.
Hey, did you know…
–Kevin has a podcast…The Peak of Potential.
Listen on Apple Podcasts Listen on Spotify Listen on Google Podcasts
If AI is not weird enough for you, check these out:
UFO footage shows ‘jellyfish’ flying over US base as troops ordered to ‘hunt it down’
Woman causes hysteria after pulling down pants mid-flight to urinate on Frontier plane
Iowa Blizzard Forces Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley To Share Hotel Room
Dog eats $4K stack of cash – and getting it back wasn’t pretty
‘Bigfoot turds’ found by woman who thinks she may have found sasquatch evidence
#EthicsInTech #DeepTech #HumanPotential #SelfActualization #AI #Futureognition #KnowledgeLegacy #TechPhilosophy #CognitiveEvolution